Fertiliser Scandal: The Truth, According To Mithika Linturi
Former Agriculture CS Mithika Linturi sets the record straight, touching on various topics including the substandard fertiliser scandal & Mt Kenya politics.
The 'Chickengate' Scandal: Former IEBC CEO James Oswago Speaks
Former IEBC CEO James Oswago opens up about the Chickengate Scandal that rocked the commission and the task ahead for the new Commissioners ahead of 2027
May 26, 2025
I'm Not Ruto's Project - Morara Kebaso
Morara Kebaso tackles GenZ unity, Kasmuel McOure, Vampire Diaries, 'Ruto project' tag and more.
May 26, 2025
Kenya's Sh4.24 Trillion Budget_ Beyond The Numbers - PS, Dr Chris Kiptoo
Treasury PS Dr Chris Kiptoo unpacks the Sh4.24 trillion FY25/26 Budget
May 26, 2025
The Current Crop of Leaders Does Not Care About The People or The Country - Prof PLO Lumumba
Former EACC Director Prof PLO Lumumba takes on the war on graft and politics on Fixing The Nation.
May 26, 2025
Why GenZs Should Man All Polling Stations in 2027 - Abdullahi Alas
Abdullahi Alas discusses the 2027 elections and what Kenyans must do differently to bring political change.
May 26, 2025
15 Billion Trees in 10 Years, How? - CS Aden Duale
April 16, 2025
Fertiliser scandal: The truth, according to Mithika Linturi
Former Agriculture Cabinet Secretary Mithika Linturi has revealed that the substandard fertilizer distributed in Kenya stemmed from a procurement rule that allowed the importation of different types of fertilizer materials.
Speaking on NTV’s Fixing the Nation, Mr Linturi said Kenya received 34,000 metric tons of raw fertilizer material from Russia, which was supposed to be blended locally, and 16,000 metric tons of finished urea from Algeria, meant for top dressing.
He clarified that the Russian consignment was not ready-to-use and required proper local processing, which may not have been done correctly, leading to quality concerns.
Mr Linturi, who was fired from his role after the dissolution of the Cabinet following youth-led protests in June last year, maintained that the problem arose from how the raw materials were handled after importation, not from the procurement decision itself.
“We received this rule, and this is where I suspect the problem of substandard fertilizer came from. In both years, we got 34,000 metric tons of fertilizer or material from Russia and 16,000 tons from Algeria.
Nobody knows exactly who stored that material. And this is where the story is. The 16,000 metric tons was urea, a finished product used for top dressing — while the 34,000 metric tons from Russia was raw material meant to be blended to produce fertilizer,” Mr Linturi said.
According to the former CS, the urea from Algeria was a finished product intended for top dressing, a method used in farming to supply crops with essential nutrients during their growth stages.
In contrast, the Russian shipment was raw material, meant to be blended locally into usable fertilizer products for distribution to farmers.
“The issue did not originate from the countries of origin or even the intention behind the imports. It’s the local handling, especially the blending process, that raised concerns,” said Mr Linturi.
He said there was no fake fertilizer, but acknowledged that if the input does not meet required standards, the farmer will not get optimal yields.
“There was no fake fertilizer,” Mr Linturi said.
The once-rated worst-performing minister said he does not take any responsibility for the procurement and distribution of substandard fertilizer.
He emphasized that his role as a minister was purely policy-oriented, not operational, and that the responsibility of accounting for ministry funds lies with the Principal Secretary.
“As a country, we need to relook at how we handle agricultural imports and ensure that systems are watertight from procurement to the point of delivery,” he stated.
He admitted that some of the fertilizer supplied did not meet the required standards but pointed out that by the time the issue was raised, the product had already been distributed to farmers, making it difficult to recall.
He claimed that the decision for the National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB) to procure fertilizer from a specific company was made by the Head of Public Service, Mr Felix Koskei.
He confirmed that the fertilizer from Russia needed to be blended before distribution to farmers, and this process was not followed as required.
“Instructions were needed. The donations had to be blended,” he emphasized.
The former CS further clarified that he was not investigating the matter personally, stating, “I’m not DCI. I’m not the State House. The police and DCI were responsible for the investigation.”
He said he was out of the country at the time, and was surprised to learn that a letter had been written on his behalf indicating he was part of a decision to halt distribution, even though he had not returned or participated in the said meeting.
“When I came back, I immediately explained the situation to my boss, and we agreed that the matter would be addressed as a top priority, I couldn’t understand why they were not answering my calls and I came to discover that the individuals were at the Police Station recording statements with the DCI,” he said.
Mr Linturi claimed that while trying to manage the distribution of the fertilizer, decisions were being made unilaterally by others, leading to contradictions and confusion.
"There was a disconnect in how we addressed the matter. The PS did things differently from what we had agreed," he said.